What is FedRAMP?
FedRAMP is a government-wide program that standardizes the security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring of cloud services used by federal agencies. It provides a standardized approach to security assessment, authorization, and continuous monitoring for cloud products and services.
Created in 2011, FedRAMP ensures that cloud services meet rigorous security standards before they can be used by federal agencies. Once authorized, a cloud service can be reused by any federal agency, eliminating duplicative efforts and reducing costs for both government and industry.
Standardized Security
Consistent security requirements across all federal agencies
Risk Management
Framework based on NIST standards for comprehensive protection
Reusability
"Do once, use many times" approach for government-wide efficiency
Authorization Pathways
The Joint Authorization Board (JAB) provides a provisional authorization (P-ATO) that can be leveraged by any federal agency. This is the most prestigious and reusable path.
Advantages
- • Highest reusability across agencies
- • JAB prioritization and support
- • Marketplace listing priority
- • Reduced agency-specific requirements
Requirements
- • JAB prioritization selection
- • FedRAMP Ready designation
- • Demonstrated agency demand
- • 12-18 month timeline
Individual agencies sponsor and authorize cloud services for their specific use, which can then be reused by other agencies.
Advantages
- • Direct agency sponsorship
- • Faster initial authorization
- • Agency-specific customization
- • Immediate agency adoption
Requirements
- • Agency sponsor commitment
- • Agency-specific controls
- • Initial customer contract
- • 6-12 month timeline
A designation indicating readiness for authorization, achieved through RAR (Readiness Assessment Report) completion. Not an authorization but demonstrates preparation.
Benefits
- • Marketplace visibility
- • JAB consideration eligibility
- • Agency confidence signal
- • Accelerated authorization
Process
- • 3PAO readiness assessment
- • RAR submission to PMO
- • PMO review and approval
- • 2-3 month timeline
Security Controls
FedRAMP security controls are based on NIST SP 800-53, with additional FedRAMP-specific controls and parameters. The number and rigor of controls increase with each impact level.
Technical Controls
- Access Control (AC)
- Audit & Accountability (AU)
- Identification & Authentication (IA)
- System & Communications (SC)
- System & Information Integrity (SI)
Operational Controls
- Awareness & Training (AT)
- Configuration Management (CM)
- Contingency Planning (CP)
- Incident Response (IR)
- Maintenance (MA)
Management Controls
- Security Assessment (CA)
- Planning (PL)
- Risk Assessment (RA)
- System & Services Acquisition (SA)
- Program Management (PM)
Encryption
FIPS 140-2 validated encryption for data at rest and in transit
Multi-Factor Authentication
Required for all privileged and non-privileged users at Moderate and High levels
Continuous Monitoring
Monthly vulnerability scanning and annual penetration testing
Incident Response
US-CERT reporting within specific timeframes based on incident category
Supply Chain Risk
Documentation and monitoring of third-party service providers
Assessment Process
Preparation & Documentation
Develop System Security Plan (SSP), implement controls, prepare security documentation package including policies, procedures, and architectural diagrams.
3PAO Selection & Kickoff
Select FedRAMP-accredited Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO), conduct kickoff meeting, define assessment scope and methodology.
Security Assessment
3PAO conducts comprehensive assessment including documentation review, security control testing, vulnerability scanning, and penetration testing.
Remediation
Address findings from assessment, implement corrective actions, update documentation, prepare Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) for accepted risks.
Authorization Package Review
Submit complete authorization package to JAB or agency sponsor, respond to reviewer questions, participate in authorization decision meetings.
Authorization & ConMon
Receive Authority to Operate (ATO), begin continuous monitoring activities, maintain authorization through ongoing compliance and reporting.
Continuous Monitoring (ConMon)
FedRAMP requires robust continuous monitoring to maintain authorization. This includes regular security assessments, vulnerability management, and incident reporting to ensure ongoing compliance and security posture.
- Vulnerability Scans: OS, database, and web application scanning
- POA&M Updates: Progress on remediation items
- Configuration Scans: Compliance with baselines
- Change Control: Significant change reporting
- Security Assessment: Subset of controls tested by 3PAO
- Penetration Testing: Application and infrastructure testing
- Contingency Plan Test: Disaster recovery exercise
- Security Training: Role-based training updates
Get a Quote
FedRAMP authorization costs vary significantly based on the impact level (Low, Moderate, or High), the complexity of your cloud service offering, your current security posture, and the authorization path you choose. Ongoing continuous monitoring and annual assessments also factor into total investment.
Get a personalized quote through the AuditNex marketplace to understand what your FedRAMP authorization will cost.
Agency Authorization
6-12 monthsJAB Authorization
12-18 monthsFedRAMP Ready
2-3 monthsGetting Started with FedRAMP
Determine Impact Level
Identify the types of federal data you'll process and appropriate security level
Secure Agency Interest
Obtain letter of interest from federal agency or apply for JAB prioritization
Conduct Gap Assessment
Evaluate current security posture against FedRAMP requirements
Build Compliance Team
Assemble internal team or engage FedRAMP consultants for guidance
Develop SSP
Create comprehensive System Security Plan using FedRAMP templates
Implement Controls
Deploy technical, operational, and management controls per requirements
Select 3PAO
Choose accredited assessment organization from FedRAMP marketplace
Success Factors
- • Executive sponsorship and funding
- • Dedicated compliance team
- • Cloud-native architecture
- • Strong documentation practices
- • Agency champion support
Common Challenges
- • Underestimating resource requirements
- • Complex inheritance models
- • Documentation maintenance burden
- • ConMon resource allocation
- • Multi-tenant architecture issues